Save Their Families, Destroy Yours

Did you hear about the American soldier who got thrown in jail because she missed her deployment plane to go save families and people in other countries? Yes, she got jailed because plans she made to have her 10-month old son cared for during her tour fell through at the last minute and she missed the plane! While she was being asked to go save other families in far away countries where she will probably be killed, she is being punished for trying to take care of a little boy who is just TEN MONTHS old.

How sad is it that the most powerful country in the world sends soldiers – young men and women, to fight injustice  and neglect in other parts of the world, yet cannot afford to take care of a 10-month old boy while his mother goes to war on our behalf.

This is not an isolated case. We have seen numerous news reports of soldiers coming home from deployment to broken marriages, estranged family relationships and mental degeneration. Many of these innocent victims of a careless administration that pays lip service to caring for our troops are just that: VICTIMS. These folks cannot express disagreement with a useless war, or the killing of innocent women and children they are faced with on a daily basis. The few who drum up enough courage to take a stand get dishonorable discharge after serving jail time.

What exactly is the U.S. military trying to investigate now that this shameless treatment of the young single mother has been exposed? “The case is under investigation” like it is a unique and isolated occurrence. It is almost a safe bet to argue that this sort of treatment happens to thousands of soldiers daily but never get national coverage. It is a despicable display of nonchalance and a disdain for a family structure within military households. It is almost as if the military is blaming the young woman for having a child.

How much would it cost for the U.S. government to provide care for the children of single parents who are deploying to battle? What message does it send to other single parents who are thinking of enlisting?

Yes, this one case will get resolved and a press conference will be held where top military parrots will deplore the “inexcusable treatment of this patriot” and we will all go back to our daily grind. And no doubt there have been  lazy arguments like:

“the 30-day notice and counseling are standard anytime a single parent could be deployed”;  “… most single-parent soldiers have a backup family care plan as well as a primary”;

“if thousands of other single-parent soldiers can and do manage, then she should be able to as well”;

And this one the most callous and ignorant of all:

“She took our tax-payer money under the agreement she would deploy if needed. It was clear, and her obligation, to find someone to take care of her child. If someone wasn’t available she should have resigned.”

The one theme from the comments above is the shallowness of the thinking of most Americans. The inability to see the bigger picture that this could be a situation that caught the Army specialist off-guard. There is almost a Hobbessian brutality that negates our attempt to brand ourselves as civilized and compassionate. The disturbing aspect of all of this is the perpetual state of denial we, as Americans, seem to be in. When we engage in acts of injustice or cruelty, we often try to justify those acts as legal or strive to blame the victim.

What do you think the reactions of the people who made the comments above would be if this was reported by CNN as an act that was perpetrated by say, the Iranian or North Korean military? There will probably be some including military leaders and members of Congress who would be clamoring for more sanctions and some form of  “strong language” of condemnation.

It is a shameful act indeed, but truthfully, as one can deduce from reading comments like the ones above, it is hardly surprising.

Posted in Civil Society, Conflict Resolution, Foreign Policy, Law and Ethics, Policy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Party of "NO"?

It’s just over a year since President Barack Obama won the U.S. presidential elections. A full year, you would assume, for the Republican Party to lick its wounds, put country first and help the new president get the country up and running as it tries to recover from what many experts have dubbed the worst recession in many decades. On the contrary and living up to the literal meaning of being conservative – backward, ignorant, short-sighted, avowedly opposed to anything progressive, key members of the party have done everything they can to sabotage the programs of the president. The lowest of these pathetic unpatriotic acts were exposed when some Republican Party heavy-weights like Newt Gingrich were shown celebrating the elimination of Chicago from the list of countries vying to host the next Olympics. As if the Olympics was only going to benefit the city of Chicago!
There is also the concerted efforts to derail the much-needed healthcare reforms. The disturbing aspect of this that while members of the Republican Party are quick to say “No” to anything that has Obama attached to it, they are very shallow when it comes to proposing an alternative.

Across the country, we saw protests about “death panels” and granny-killing. Guns were brought to Obama appearances. A pastor (believe it or not) in Arizona said he was praying for Obama to die. Of course, we are all very familiar by now with Rep. Joe Wilson’s (R-S.C.) appalling display on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives when he shouted at the president from his fifth-row seat: “You lie!”
The latest is the resort to calling the president “weak”, “indecisive”, “jeopardizing national security” etc. because unlike the Republicans and particularly unlike former president George W. Bush, Obama has refused to rush to judgment in committing the lives of thousands of young Americans to a war we should not be fighting in the first place. Agreed, political reality has forced the president to reassess some of his earlier proclamations in terms of national policy. But that is the sign of a good leader and commander. When the reality of battle hits and things are not going well, you go back to the drawing board and re-strategize with the goal of inflicting the maximum casualty on the enemy while minimizing your losses.

For “ordinary” Americans who are egging on these Republican Party leaders in their campaign to “make sure Obama fails”, we should point out that no matter what happens, Obama will never want for health care, security, wealth and fame. If health care reform fails, we, the people are the ones who will die because we could not afford to go the hospital and most like have financial difficulties because we could not afford the huge bills that are bound to come after you get out of the hospital. His name is already in the history books as the President of the United States of America. He is bound to make a lot of money even if he did not get re-elected because there will be the usual books, speeches and consulting engagements former presidents have access to. If he is not allowed to handle the war in Afghanistan in a pragmatic manner that will lead to some form of acceptable resolution, thousands of American soldiers will die.

I have seen Americans, at the prompting of Republican Party leaders, protesting with pictures of Obama as Hitler. My question to theses Americans is, “What would be your reaction if you saw people in other countries with the picture you are holding of your president portrayed as Adolf Hitler accompanied with derogatory remarks? If I were to take a guess, you will most likely want to go kick their ass!

The world is watching. For a country that claims to be civilized, a lot of our actions make me wonder. As the president aptly put it: When “we can no longer even engage in a civil conversation with each other over the things that truly matter, we don’t merely lose our capacity to solve big challenges. We lose something essential about ourselves.”

Posted in Civil Society, History, North America, Policy, Political Economy, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Foreign Aid and The Mirage Of Poverty Eradication

The reality of aid… is that it
continues to fail to promote human
development for the eradication of poverty
based on the core values of human rights,
democracy, gender equality and
environmental sustainability. This is despite
the appearance of progress in the form of
high-profile debt cancellations, new aid
pledges, and the signing of the Paris
Declaration on aid effectiveness – Caterina Amicucci Continue reading

Posted in Civil Society, Economy, Education, Foreign Policy, History, Law and Ethics, Political Economy, Poverty, Underdevelopment, World Affairs | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Guantanamo and the New Imperialism

So the United States wants to close down the “tainted” gulag called Guantanamo Bay Prisons but the ruling elite represented by the American congress does not want any of the prisoners “on our soil”. Let’s get the difficult question out of the way: if the U.S., who snatched these individuals from various corners of the world on the pretext that they were “enemy combatants” is not willing to habour these people, where are they going to be sent? Continue reading

Posted in Civil Society, Conflict Resolution, Constitutionalism, Foreign Policy, Law and Ethics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What does Dick Chenney want?

For eight long years, he looked at us with scorn and despised the media. He brushed off the concerns of Americans about the unethical behavior of the Bush administration and devised the most egregious form of abuse of the U.S. constitution in the history of the country. You would think that someone with such an unenviable track record would gladly accept the relative obscurity that comes with being out of public office. Not former Vice President Dick Chenney. All of a sudden, he has become the spokesperson of the Republican party’s misguided obstructionist stance toward the new president. Continue reading

Posted in Civil Society, Constitutionalism, Law and Ethics, North America, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment